Having worked in the life insurance industry, I often get asked what is the difference between term life and whole life insurance. It is an understandable question as there is quite a bit of misinformation in the term life vs. whole life debate. That misinformation or confusion can make it difficult for many when they’re faced with the decision of what kind of life insurance coverage they should purchase.
If you read my previous post on When is the Best Time to Buy Life Insurance you know that the younger you are, the better it is for you to buy life insurance. Now we want to take a look at the two main options you’re going to be faced with when looking at buying life insurance coverage.
The Difference Between Term Life and Whole Life Insurance
The main difference between term life and whole life insurance coverage really comes down to a renting vs. buying mindset. With term life insurance you are essentially renting coverage that spans a defined time period. Whether that be something short like five years or as far out as 30 years, your coverage will have an end point. If you outlive the coverage, then the insurance expires and you receive no value.
With whole life insurance, it is as it sounds. It lasts your entire life. This sounds good on one hand, and I’ll cover the pros/cons of that later. As it would make sense, you are going to pay more for whole life coverage because it lasts the entirety of your life. As that presents more risks, generally speaking you’re going to pay significantly more for permanent coverage.
Beyond time span and cost, the other difference between term life and whole life insurance is how the premiums are handled. With term life, the premiums pay towards the policy and that’s it. With whole life, part of the premiums go to build a small cash value that gets added to the overall value of the policy. If this thoroughly confuses you, hopefully the next section will clarify things a bit and help you with your purchasing decisions.
The Case for Term Life Insurance
The biggest positive term life insurance has going for it is that it is generally considerably cheaper to purchase. Those who know me know I like to get value in what I buy and life insurance is no different.
As term life insurance is cheaper this also allows you the opportunity to buy more coverage which is great for someone like me. If you’re relatively healthy and younger you should have no issue finding coverage of at least several hundred thousand dollars for somewhere around $20 per month. With most term life policies having level terms for the entirety of the term it can provide great value that can’t be found in a whole life policy.
Outside of those main reasons of why to buy term life insurance, the simple fact is term life coverage is straight forward. You pay a premium and get coverage. Nothing more and nothing less. As a result, this can be great for families wanting to cover potential short term needs in the event of your passing or to cover major expenses like a mortgage or college for your family.
The Case for Whole Life Insurance
As a disclaimer, I write this as someone who does not own whole life insurance. That being said, however, I do not believe it’s a bad product, just something that gets pitched the wrong way.
Whole life insurance has the same benefit of term life coverage in that your premiums are stable over the life of the policy. You don’t see premiums go up, you just pay the same premiums for your entire life, or you lapse the policy. The other main benefit of having whole life coverage is that it builds a small cash value aside from the face value of the policy. While having that additional cash value is nice, it is important to note that this cash value is not invested in the stock market or in anything you can control but is generally managed at the discretion of the life insurance company.
While whole life insurance may not be a good fit for younger individuals, it can be a good fit for those who have high incomes or have a considerable net worth. Think in the neighborhood of at least $1 Million.
Term Life vs. Whole Life Insurance – The Decision
At the end of the day, the term life vs. whole life insurance decision is one that needs to be done in light of what’s best for you. That said, in the overwhelming majority of the time term life insurance is going to serve your needs. Of course, that should be viewed in light of your specific circumstance as what is best for most may not be what’s best for you and your situation.
As I pointed out in my previous post on life insurance, there are many sales reps that will use numbers to try and convince you that whole life is the way to go when it comes to purchasing life insurance. Of course not all are this way, as the “bad” ones make it easy to view all in the light. That is not the case, but it is something to be mindful of.
I will say that if you are considering purchasing whole life insurance to make sure that you have your other investment needs covered first. That means things like maxing out your 401k plan at work, potentially fully funding an IRA, and even possibly educational needs of children prior to getting serious in buying a whole life policy. Beyond that, you generally would not want to buy whole life coverage before having a fully funded emergency fund and all consumer debt paid off. Essentially, you want to cover things that are going to bring you greater return and provide for you in the short term if something were to happen to your job.
There are a number of differences between term life and whole life insurance, so make sure you educate yourself on them before making a purchasing decision. The difference is real money, so make sure it’s not one you take lightly.
What are your thoughts on term life versus whole life insurance? What kind of life insurance coverage do you have?
Photo courtesy of: David Amsler
Latest posts by John Schmoll (see all)
- How to Budget for Your First Car - April 26, 2017
- 4 Digital Savings Tools to Save Money When Shopping Online - April 19, 2017
- 3 Reasons a Cash Budget May Save You More Money - April 12, 2017